000 02766cam a2200253 i 4500
001 22395531
003 OSt
005 20230609132436.0
008 220125s2022 enk b 001 0 eng d
020 _a9780192859082
_q(hardback)
_cRs. 1495.00
040 _aIDSK
_beng
_cIDSK
082 0 4 _a323.60954
_223
_bR8881c
100 1 _aRoy, Anupama,
_eauthor.
_94494
245 1 0 _aCitizenship regimes, law, and belonging :
_bthe CAA and the NRC /
_cAnupama Roy.
250 _aFirst edition.
264 1 _aOxford :
_bOxford University Press,
_c2022.
300 _avi, 270 pages ;
_c23 cm
504 _aIncludes bibliographical references (pages 251-259) and index.
520 _a"Successive amendments in the citizenship law in India have spawned distinct regimes of citizenship. The idea of citizenship regimes is crucial for making the argument that law must be seen not simply as bare provisions but also examined for the ideological practices that validate it and lay claims to its enforceability. While citizenship regime in India can be distinguished from one another on the basis on their distinct political and legal rationalities, cumulatively they present a movement from jus soli to jus sanguinis. The movement towards jus sanguinis has been a complex process of entrenchment of exclusionary nationhood under the veneer of liberal citizenship. This work argues that the contemporary landscape of citizenship in India is dominated by the Citizenship Amendment Act (CAA) 2019 and the National Register of Citizens (NRC). The CAA 2019 and the NRC emerged as distinct tendencies from the amendment in the citizenship law in 2003. These tendencies subsequently become conjoined in an ideological alignment to make citizenship dependent on lineage, spelling out ideas of belonging which are tied to descent and blood ties. The NRC has invoked the spectre of 'crisis' in citizenship generated by indiscriminate immigration and the risks presented by 'illegal migrants', to justify an extraordinary regime of citizenship. The CAA provides for the exemption of some migrants from this regime by making religion the criterion of distinguishability. The CAA 2019 and NRC have generated a regime of 'bounded citizenship' based on the assumption that citizenship can be passed on as a legacy of ancestry making it a natural and constitutive identity. The politics of Hindutva serves as an ideological apparatus buttressing the regime and propelling the movement away from the foundational principles of secular-constitutionalism that characterised Indian citizenship in 1949." --
_cPublisher's website
610 1 0 _aIndia.
_tCitizenship Amendment Act, 2019.
_94495
650 0 _aCitizenship
_zIndia.
_94496
653 _aNational Register of Citizens (India)
942 _2ddc
_c010
999 _c23353
_d23353